<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unexpected Cookies â€“ Are They Bad for Your Health?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smartcutgeek.com/featured-articles/unexpected-cookies-are-they-bad-for-your-health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smartcutgeek.com/off-the-wall/unexpected-cookies-are-they-bad-for-your-health/</link>
	<description>solving your implementation gap</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim E</title>
		<link>http://smartcutgeek.com/off-the-wall/unexpected-cookies-are-they-bad-for-your-health/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smartcutgeek.com/137/unexpected-cookies-are-they-bad-for-your-health/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike! 
It sounds like a pretty good deal to me, except it is not so great that the user is unaware of it. ONe the one hand,they certainly have the choice of how their computer accepts cookies and it seems that we get cookies on just about every site these days.
I guess the downfall is that it places cookies to items the user hasn&#039;t seen yet and perhaps the site owner could/would add lots of affiliate links for things that he/she doesn&#039;t even mention or that I didn&#039;t see on his/her site...then I wouldn&#039;t realize that I needed to clear my cookies if I did want someone particular to get credit for my purchase. I have deliberately went to Carrie&#039;s links more than once and this might not be something I would appreciate if I found that she did not get credit for the sale due to such a tatic...
Hmm...not sure what I think I guess!
Thanks for the post!
Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike!<br />
It sounds like a pretty good deal to me, except it is not so great that the user is unaware of it. ONe the one hand,they certainly have the choice of how their computer accepts cookies and it seems that we get cookies on just about every site these days.<br />
I guess the downfall is that it places cookies to items the user hasn&#8217;t seen yet and perhaps the site owner could/would add lots of affiliate links for things that he/she doesn&#8217;t even mention or that I didn&#8217;t see on his/her site&#8230;then I wouldn&#8217;t realize that I needed to clear my cookies if I did want someone particular to get credit for my purchase. I have deliberately went to Carrie&#8217;s links more than once and this might not be something I would appreciate if I found that she did not get credit for the sale due to such a tatic&#8230;<br />
Hmm&#8230;not sure what I think I guess!<br />
Thanks for the post!<br />
Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

